Teams that run paid acquisition at scale eventually learn the same lesson: the asset is not “an account”, it is an access system. This article explains how a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding can evaluate Facebook Facebook fan pages and Reddit Reddit accounts in a way that prioritizes authorized control, documentation, and predictable operations. The goal is simple—reduce incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs by making ownership, roles, and billing decisions explicit before campaigns depend on them.
How to choose accounts for ads when documentation matters as much as performance for teams that need clean handoffs
If your media buying program depends on reliable ad access, https://npprteam.shop/en/articles/accounts-review/a-guide-to-choosing-accounts-for-facebook-ads-google-ads-tiktok-ads-based-on-npprteamshop/ is a starting point for translating risk into documented ownership, explicit consent, and a reversible role map. Treat the purchase decision as vendor onboarding: define who approves, what evidence is required, and where records will live. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments.
Use a two-person rule for sensitive actions: one person requests and documents the change, another validates the outcome against a checklist and signs the ticket. Use naming conventions that encode owner and purpose so the portfolio stays readable when the team changes. Use naming conventions that encode owner and purpose so the portfolio stays readable when the team changes. Log every admin addition with a reason tied to a task, then remove access when the task ends. In charity fundraising, small inconsistencies become big issues; standardize naming, document billing entity details, and keep the handoff checklist versioned. Capture screenshots or exports of role lists and billing settings on day one; treat them as baseline evidence for later audits. Use naming conventions that encode owner and purpose so the portfolio stays readable when the team changes Keep it simple and repeatable.
Portfolio rules for Reddit Reddit accounts: who can change what, and when to keep permissions explicit
When scaling campaigns, Reddit Reddit accounts need governance; buy contract-backed Reddit accounts for agency teams with a transfer log — transfer-ready in local legal services growth can fit if a clean admin roster, change logs, and finance-approved billing controls is documented. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Define support boundaries with the seller: what they will answer after transfer, and what they will not touch.
Create a handoff packet that includes a dated role map, a billing snapshot, and a short narrative of what changed; store it where your team already keeps approvals. In charity fundraising, small inconsistencies become big issues; standardize naming, document billing entity details, and keep the handoff checklist versioned Keep it simple and repeatable. Keep a short incident playbook: revoke access, pause spend where possible, document the timeline, and notify stakeholders. If you are managing multiple assets, set thresholds: above a certain spend level, require an extra review step focused on billing hygiene and admin roster drift. Set spend governance rules in writing: who can raise limits, who can add payment methods, and how exceptions are recorded. Avoid mixing client and agency billing entities; reconcile through invoices rather than informal reimbursements.
Building a compliant inventory of Facebook Facebook fan pages: governance basics with documented admin history
For Facebook Facebook fan pages sourcing, Facebook fan pages with documented access roles for regulated workflows and approval-ready evidence for sale — audit-ready for local legal services programs should be judged against a named owner, admin history, and billing separation you can explain before any spend is moved. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver.
Make the new owner accountable by removing legacy admins promptly and re-issuing access through named roles; avoid shared passwords and avoid “temporary” logins. Because incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs is common, add a simple control: a written approval is required for any new admin, and that approval references the same evidence packet used at purchase time. Use naming conventions that encode owner and purpose so the portfolio stays readable when the team changes. In charity fundraising, small inconsistencies become big issues; standardize naming, document billing entity details, and keep the handoff checklist versioned. Set spend governance rules in writing: who can raise limits, who can add payment methods, and how exceptions are recorded. Log every admin addition with a reason tied to a task, then remove access when the task ends.
What documents make an access transfer truly authorized?
Start by setting a boundary: your team only accepts assets when transfer is authorized, documented, and reversible. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings, especially when multiple people touch the same asset This is not paperwork; it is control. Treat the purchase decision as vendor onboarding: define who approves, what evidence is required, and where records will live. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. Avoid “temporary admin” exceptions; each exception should have an expiry, a reason, and a follow-up verification step. For charity fundraising teams, the fastest way to reduce incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs is to standardize evidence requests and keep them in one review packet, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
Define ownership and consent
Ownership is not a feeling; it is a record. Require a named owner and written consent that describes what is being transferred and to whom. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings This is not paperwork; it is control. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver.
Translate policy risk into acceptance criteria
Make the risk legible: if the platform’s rules do not support a transfer model, the safest decision is to not proceed. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why, especially when multiple people touch the same asset This is not paperwork; it is control. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
Access control: least privilege, clear ownership, and clean handoffs
The fastest way to create hidden risk is to let access spread informally. Build a role map that matches tasks and keeps authority narrow. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver.
Role mapping: owner, admin, operator
Define three layers: an accountable owner, a small set of admins for configuration, and operators who run daily work. Put it in writing. Define support boundaries with the seller: what they will answer after transfer, and what they will not touch This is not paperwork; it is control. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log, especially when multiple people touch the same asset This is not paperwork; it is control. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
Credential custody and recovery channels
Recovery options are the real keys. Move them to team-controlled channels, document who can reset access, and test recovery before campaigns rely on it. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion This is not paperwork; it is control. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log This is not paperwork; it is control. Avoid “temporary admin” exceptions; each exception should have an expiry, a reason, and a follow-up verification step.
What billing controls prevent unpleasant surprises?
Billing is where risk becomes real. Keep billing changes controlled, documented, and reversible, with clear accountability. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. Write down what “authorized transfer” means for your team: named owner, documented consent, and a reversible access plan This is not paperwork; it is control. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute This is not paperwork; it is control. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver This is not paperwork; it is control. For charity fundraising teams, the fastest way to reduce incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs is to standardize evidence requests and keep them in one review packet. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows.
Spend governance rules that finance can audit
Write spend rules like internal policy: who can add a payment method, who can raise limits, and what evidence is stored for each action. Separate operational access from billing authority so one mistake cannot cascade into spend you cannot explain This is not paperwork; it is control. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion.
Separation, reconciliation, and change logs
Use separation as a default: do not mix billing entities across brands, and reconcile through invoices with clear references to the asset and time period. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Avoid “temporary admin” exceptions; each exception should have an expiry, a reason, and a follow-up verification step. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. For charity fundraising teams, the fastest way to reduce incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs is to standardize evidence requests and keep them in one review packet This is not paperwork; it is control.
- Maintain a single “billing snapshot” file per asset per month for audit readiness
- Require approval tickets for any billing change and attach screenshots/exports
- Document refunds, disputes, and remediations in the same record set
- Keep one billing owner per asset and record the name in the portfolio register
- Reconcile invoices or receipts on a fixed cadence (weekly at first, then monthly)
- Remove legacy payment instruments as part of the cutover checklist when appropriate
- Set spend caps and review thresholds that trigger additional sign-off
Approval gates that keep procurement predictable
To keep decisions consistent, score what you can verify. You are not rating “quality”, you are rating evidence, control, and reversibility. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility. Separate operational access from billing authority so one mistake cannot cascade into spend you cannot explain, especially when multiple people touch the same asset This is not paperwork; it is control. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver This is not paperwork; it is control.
| Control item | Verification step | Operational value | Stop condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Change log | Ticketed record of what changed at cutover | Supports audits | No timeline of changes |
| Admin roster | Export roles and compare to policy | Reduces role drift | Too many admins or unknown parties |
| Support boundary | Single channel and limited scope | Prevents unauthorized edits | Seller requests admin access post-transfer |
| Data privacy | Confirm shared notes exclude personal data | Reduces privacy risk | PII stored in shared docs |
| Billing separation | Billing entity and payment method snapshot | Limits finance exposure | Shared instruments across brands |
| Ownership proof | Written authorization and chain of custody | Prevents access disputes | No named owner or vague permission |
Stop conditions that should pause procurement
Red flags are useful because they prevent negotiation with reality. If you hit one, pause and escalate; do not “patch it later”. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
- Requests to keep legacy admins “just in case” after the cutover
- Recovery email or phone controlled by someone outside your organization
- Unwillingness to provide a dated role export or change timeline
- Any request for identity spoofing, forged documents, or non-consensual access
- Pressure to skip documentation because “it always works out”
- Shared billing instruments across unrelated brands or entities
- No written authorization naming the current owner and the recipient
Approval gates should be explicit: who can accept the risk, what evidence closes the gap, and when the decision is revisited. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. For charity fundraising teams, the fastest way to reduce incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs is to standardize evidence requests and keep them in one review packet. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Treat the purchase decision as vendor onboarding: define who approves, what evidence is required, and where records will live. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
Quick checklist for an audit-ready handoff
Use this short checklist as a final gate. If you cannot check a box with evidence, treat it as a “no” until resolved. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion. Use least-privilege roles first, then expand only when a specific task cannot be completed otherwise. Use least-privilege roles first, then expand only when a specific task cannot be completed otherwise. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings. Instead of chasing performance myths, evaluate governance signals you can actually verify: roles, consent, and billing separation.
- Portfolio register updated with owner, admins, and review date
- Cutover plan with a timestamp, executor, validator, and rollback notes
- Billing entity and spend governance rules documented and signed
- Recovery channels moved to team-controlled email/phone where applicable
- Support boundary agreed: single channel, limited scope, no admin access
- Role map matches tasks (owner/admin/operator) and is approved
- Post-transfer audit cadence scheduled (weekly, then monthly)
- Named owner and written authorization for the transfer
A checklist is only useful if it is enforced. Tie it to procurement approval, and require a short retrospective after the first month. Use least-privilege roles first, then expand only when a specific task cannot be completed otherwise, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. In cross-platform programs, keep the same control language across tools: owner, admin, operator, and finance approver.
Mini-scenarios: how governance fails in real teams
Hypothetical scenarios are useful because they force you to test your controls. The details differ, but the failure points repeat. Write down what “authorized transfer” means for your team: named owner, documented consent, and a reversible access plan, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist. Define support boundaries with the seller: what they will answer after transfer, and what they will not touch. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist.
Scenario A: mobile gaming growth sprint
A mobile gaming team ramps spend fast and then hits a sudden billing dispute during a weekend launch. The root cause is not “performance”; it is missing evidence and unclear billing authority. Aim for audit readability: a third party should be able to reconstruct who had access, when it changed, and why. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log. Avoid “temporary admin” exceptions; each exception should have an expiry, a reason, and a follow-up verification step, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments. If you operate across regions, add a simple rule: no shared payment instruments and no role changes without a ban on unmanaged third-party access, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
Scenario B: fashion resale operations handoff
In fashion resale, the team completes a transfer but later discovers support boundary confusion that triggers unauthorized changes. The problem is role drift and a handoff packet that was never finalized. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows This is not paperwork; it is control. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. Define support boundaries with the seller: what they will answer after transfer, and what they will not touch. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket. Separate operational access from billing authority so one mistake cannot cascade into spend you cannot explain This is not paperwork; it is control. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion.
Operational lesson: if your controls are not written and repeated, they do not exist when a crisis arrives.
Use scenarios like these to pressure-test your checklist. If you cannot explain who would act, what they would change, and where it would be recorded, tighten the process. Use least-privilege roles first, then expand only when a specific task cannot be completed otherwise, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility. Keep personal data out of shared notes and store only what you need to justify permissions and payments This is not paperwork; it is control. For charity fundraising teams, the fastest way to reduce incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs is to standardize evidence requests and keep them in one review packet, especially when multiple people touch the same asset This is not paperwork; it is control.
Post-transfer monitoring: the first 72 hours and the first 30 days
The work is not finished at the cutover. Monitoring turns a one-time handoff into stable ownership with predictable responsibilities. Avoid “temporary admin” exceptions; each exception should have an expiry, a reason, and a follow-up verification step. If you operate across regions, add a simple rule: no shared payment instruments and no role changes without a ban on unmanaged third-party access. If documentation is missing, slow down; speed without evidence becomes a future access dispute This is not paperwork; it is control. Separate operational access from billing authority so one mistake cannot cascade into spend you cannot explain. Plan a cutover window with clear responsibilities: who changes passwords, who verifies roles, and who validates billing settings. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion, especially when multiple people touch the same asset.
First 72 hours: stabilize and baseline
In the first 72 hours, focus on baselining: confirm roles, confirm billing settings, and confirm that recovery channels are controlled by your team. Write down what “authorized transfer” means for your team: named owner, documented consent, and a reversible access plan. Write down what “authorized transfer” means for your team: named owner, documented consent, and a reversible access plan, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Separate operational access from billing authority so one mistake cannot cascade into spend you cannot explain. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility. Write down what “authorized transfer” means for your team: named owner, documented consent, and a reversible access plan.
- Document where credentials and role maps are stored (single source of truth)
- Verify recovery email/phone and notification routes
- Confirm billing entity details and document spend governance rules
- Export and store current admin/role lists as baseline evidence
- Schedule the first weekly audit and assign an owner
- Review and remove any legacy admins not required for support boundaries
- Create a ticketed record of all changes made during cutover
First 30 days: prevent drift
Over the first month, watch for drift: extra admins, undocumented billing edits, or unclear responsibility. Drift is the silent cause of future lockouts and disputes. A good handoff leaves no ambiguity: the previous owner is removed, permissions are re-issued, and the new team documents the moment of responsibility, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Treat the purchase decision as vendor onboarding: define who approves, what evidence is required, and where records will live, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. If the asset is shared across brands, enforce naming conventions and a portfolio register so incomplete transfer documentation during handoffs does not hide in confusion This is not paperwork; it is control. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket This is not paperwork; it is control. When a risk analyst reviewing vendor onboarding signs off, they should be able to point to a short record: ownership proof, role map, billing snapshot, and change log.
- Quarterly access recertification for all admins and operators
- Weekly review of admin roster changes and approval tickets
- Retrospective notes: what evidence was missing and how to fix the process
- Monthly billing snapshot for finance reconciliation
- Remove access for contractors whose tasks are complete
- Update the portfolio register and close open risks
If you make monitoring routine, procurement becomes safer over time because the same evidence and controls are reused instead of reinvented. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows. Make access changes observable: log the request, the approval, the execution, and the post-change validation in a single ticket, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows. For charity fundraising campaigns, insist on a two-step validation: one person applies changes, another confirms outcomes against a checklist, especially when multiple people touch the same asset. If you operate across regions, add a simple rule: no shared payment instruments and no role changes without a ban on unmanaged third-party access. Require a single source of truth for credentials and role assignments; avoid “just DM me the login” workflows.
浙江省人民医院心血管内科简介
心血管内科作为医院重中之重学科，技术力量雄厚，科研设备先进，综合实力居省内领先水平，具有鲜明的临床特色。心内科是浙江省临床重点专科、浙江省中医药重点学科、浙江省心脑血管病临床医学研究中心核心单位和杭州医学院心血管病研究所，在医疗、教学、科研等方面均取得了显著成就。
本科室拥有一支高素质的医护团队，包括医生50名，技师3名，其中博士20名，硕士29名，正高职称13名，副高职称10名。护理人员70人，副主任护师3名。技术力量雄厚，拥有各方面人才。作为多家知名医学院校的博硕研究生培养基地，有博士生导师1名，硕士生导师3名。科室为冠脉、心律失常、结构性心脏病、CRT起搏的国家级介入诊疗培训基地，是国内首批且连续8年省内唯一的国家级先心病介入诊疗培训基地，为心血管介入领域培养了大量专业技术人才。
心内科专注于各类心血管疾病的诊治，包括高血压、冠心病、先天性心脏病、心律失常、心力衰竭等。以心血管病介入诊疗为特色，能够开展目前所有国内主流的心血管介入诊疗技术，技术全面，包括：冠脉介入诊疗技术（如冠脉造影、冠脉支架植入、血管内超声（IVUS）、冠脉血流储备测定（FFR）、冠脉药物球囊、冠脉内旋磨、冠脉内冲击波球囊、肥厚性心肌病化学消融、冠状动脉瘘封堵等）、心内电生理检查、射频消融（如室上速射频消融、室早/室速射频消融、房扑/房颤射频消融等）、冷冻消融（如室上速冷冻消融、房颤冷冻球囊消融等）、心脏起搏器植入（如单腔起搏器、双腔起搏器、三腔起搏器CRT/CRT-D、除颤起搏器ICD、植入术心电记录器等）、先天性心脏病介入封堵术（如房间隔缺损、室间隔缺损、动脉导管未闭、卵圆孔未闭等）、左心耳封堵预防房颤血栓等。
心律失常介入治疗是科室的主要特色之一，采用先进的三维标测技术，手术成功率高，并发症少。本科室是国内最早引进先进心内膜激动标测系统的医院之一，开创了国内三维电生理标测指导射频消融的先河。冠脉介入团队在急性心肌梗死的急诊介入治疗等方面处于省内领先地位。结构性心脏病团队在先天性心脏病介入治疗方面成绩斐然，是浙江省内唯一的首批国家级先心病介入治疗培训基地。起搏团队在心脏起搏器植入技术等方面达到省内领先水平。
近年来，心内科在国内外核心期刊发表学术论文100余篇，其中SCI论文近百篇。科室主编多部心电生理专著，近年来主持国家自然科学基金6项、省部级课题14项、厅局级课题50+项，研究经费400余万元。科室荣获国家教育部高等学校科学研究优秀成果奖（自然科学）二等奖、浙江省科学技术进步奖二等奖、浙江省高等学校科研成果奖三等奖、浙江省中医药科研成果三等奖各1项。在教学方面，心内科是多所高校的见习及实习基地，承担了大量的理论及实践带教工作。教学团队多次获得校级、院级优秀带教老师、优秀教学秘书、优秀教学科室等称号。
心内科始终将医疗质量与安全作为日常临床工作的重点，连续三年获得医院医疗质量安全奖第一名，成为医院的明星科室。科室将继续秉持”以病人为中心，医疗、教学、科研为一体”的理念，不断创新，努力提升医疗水平，为患者提供更优质的诊疗服务。